Search Results

CDSK WBG Score: 7 Player Count: 2-16 You’ll like this if you like: Any trivia game Published by: Randolph Designed by: Vincent Burger This is a free review copy. See our review policy here By Steve Godfrey A game about trivia you say? Where some questions ask you to list things in order to gain points? Ok then! Welcome to the first ever (I’m assuming, please don’t look it up and burst my bubble) board game review challenge game. How many quiz shows do I “expertly” shoehorn into this review 1 point for each answer at the end, let me know how well you did in the comments. Let’s hope you don’t draw a Blankety Blank. Answers at the end How to quiz Open out the box and reveal the scoring track, get together in teams (as many as you want) and then find something to use as scoring tokens for each team and you're all set up. On your team's turn, look at the space you're currently on and get another team to pick a card of that type. There are four types: Curious - precise or bizarre subjects. Delightful - Music, movies and sports. Seasoned - Grown up type stuff (not that type of grown up, it’s not that sort of game) Knowledge - science, nature, geography and history. Regardless of the type each card will ask “on a scale of 1 to 10 how well do you know……..” for example! Blockbusters. The team then has to determine how well they think they know that subject and pick a number between 1 and 10. Each card will have 10 questions on it and they'll get asked a question based on the number they picked with one being the easiest and ten being the hardest. If they get it right they score that many points and move that far round the track. If not then you go Pointless for that turn. If a team starts on a challenge space (it looks like a ticket) they answer a challenge card. These could be to answer some questions and get a point for each correct answer or they could be, name as many…….Family Fortunes hosts in 30 seconds style questions. Teams on the last space need to answer a “hurry up and win” card. These will have a variety of question types as well. Get this one right and you win the game. Get it wrong and you get to panic as you watch opponents ride that big old Wheel of Fortune to try and catch up to you. Become the Oracle. The problem with a lot of trivia games is you either know the answer to a question or you don’t. Some you can guess at, but for the most part if the questions aren’t going your way then you’re not gonna have a great time and it can be so easy to feel stupid as you see other players storm ahead to victory with no way of you getting the points to catch up. CDSK is a trivia game that does its best to try to alleviate that and give everyone a chance to feel like they’ve not just gone the quiz equivalent of going toe to toe with one of the chasers from The Chase. Not least because you’ll be in teams….unless you decide to go head to head which could be Quite Interesting. In terms of difficulty the questions range from, you should easily get this, think the first question from Who Wants to be a Millionaire to, yes, you have just accidentally walked on to the set of University Challenge….. well maybe not quite that hard. Depending on your team there can be a really nice dynamic as you try and gauge how far you want to push your knowledge of each subject. At some point some will say, “I reckon we go 5 on this one” and without fail someone will say “nah, at least a 7.” It’s then you’ve got to decide how much you trust this Mastermind's knowledge of that subject, It’s a genuine gamble. You want to go as high as you can, but you also don’t want to go too far above your means because it’s always best to get a question right and move somewhere than to get too ambitious and not move at all, especially if you're in a category where your team isn’t the strongest. It might even be a good strategy to go for the questions that would move you and Bullseye you onto your preferred subjects. The challenge spaces change things up and add a bit more of a group dynamic, especially the timed challenges. For example, name as many yellow characters that don’t come from the Simpsons in 45 seconds and get a point for each correct answer. At which point everyone will be shouting out answers and it all descends into chaotic fun. When it comes to game length you’ve got a classic and an express starting space for a shorter game. Definitely use the shorter game if you’ve got a few teams because it could be a loooong one but other than that go with your gut. I think the shorter game is perfect for an end of the night game but if you’ve got a few smarty pants on a team then it could be quick enough that you could reset and start again. If you like it then you’d better put a band on it. So production wise I’m kinda torn on this one. On the one hand I love the fact that the board opens out from the box and it sets up in seconds. On the other hand the magnetic clasp on the box (on my copy at least, I can’t speak for anyone else’s ) isn’t that strong and takes no effort for it to get nudged open. I had an incident where the box got flipped on its side in a bag and the box opened and there were cards everywhere. My worry is that if all the boxes are the same then anyone who stores their games vertically could have the same thing happen when pulling the game off the shelf and a bit of weight pushes the lid open. I’m also not sure on the decision to not provide score markers and have teams pick their own. Again on the one hand it keeps the cost down and makes for a bit of a creative flair for the players. Seeing a Lego minifig run round the board after a little superman toy is fun and is definitely in keeping with the spirit of the game (the rules and some of the cards themselves can be pretty amusing) But I do worry what will happen in the situations where you don’t have anything to hand that’s small enough to use. Of course there’s nothing stopping you throwing a couple of odd nick knacks in the box just in case. There’s enough room in there but because of the potential clasp problem I wouldn’t make it anything too heavy that’s gonna put your box in Jeopardy We’ve had fun with CDSK (the name doesn’t do it any favours though), there’s laughter to be had for a quick end of the night game or as an addition to an evening of party games. I’d happily throw this in my bag to be put into the mix. Maybe not throw, more, gently place, with maybe a band around it. So did you get all 12? I’ll put the answers in the comments.

Bunny Kingdom: In The Sky WBG Score: 8 Player Count: 2-5 You’ll like this if you like: Small World, Blood Rage, Bunny Kingdom Published by: IELLO Designed by: Richard Garfield Bunny Kingdom is a brilliant game. I will assume you know about the base game if you are reading this review for the In The Sky expansion. For anyone out of the Bunny loop, very briefly, Bunny Kingdom is a drafting area-control game. Players will be dealt a hand of cards, from which they take two before handing the rest to the next player. They will do this until all cards are drafted. The cards will mainly give them the opportunity to put a bunny of their colour onto a grid based board to create what the game calls a Fief of their bunnies. Other cards allow you to add buildings or resources to certain spaces of the board. Your points are tallied by multiplying the buildings' turrets in your fief by the resources you have in the same area. There are multiple rounds and by the end the board gets very busy. Scoring can be tricky from a visual perspective, there is a lot to take in. But the game itself is a lot of fun and one of my families absolute favourites. Points get well into the three figures, and as much as it is a struggle to score at the end, we all love it! So, we were all very keen to try this expansion. Thankfully, it did not disappoint! Let's get it to the table. In The Sky introduces SEVEN new main new concepts. Let's look at them all one by one. A whole new board! The first main addition to this excellent expansion is the new board. Set-up to include In The Sky is pretty much the same as the base game, except for shuffling in the new cards, adding in the new components to the board, and placing this new shared board down on the table. It's all very simple to include as any good expansion should be. The new board shows the Great Cloud. You can place bunnies and build Fiefs on this new board like the main board, and add buildings to it so long as you meet the buildings requirements. The new board does not have a grid system like the main board, rather five rows marked by golden clouds, and then five spaces in each. So, the card showing one cloud and a number one will be placed in the first spot on the top left. This is the unicorn card shown below. One my daughter particularly likes! But in a game that is all about creating large groups of your own controlled Fiefs, why would you want to separate your bunnies onto a different board in this way? Well, much like the Sky Towers in the base game, Rainbows can be used to link two different Fiefs. Rainbows The Rainbows act exactly as the Sky Towers do, connecting two pairs of Fiefs. There are two sets in the game and they connect the two boards. Having the second board is a great way to create more space, and using the rainbows is a good way to still allow for the bunnies on each board to be connected. I think the main benefit from introducing the second board was to increase the games' capacity from a maximum of four players to a five. Without an extra board, all those extra bunnies would start to get on top of each other. The only other solution would be to remove some bunnies and cards per player creating a shorter, smaller game. I would say the extra board is a good solution. But remember how hard it was to score at the end of a four player game? Yeah, well, try now with five sets of bunnies and a separate board to add up! It gets a bit confusing! But that's a problem for the end of the game. The actual game experience is fantastic. Carrotodels You may have noticed that rather enticing looking five tower building in the picture above. Well, these are the new brilliantly titled Carrotodels. They will instantly add a multiplier of five to any fief you create. The sad news is they only count if your total strength in a fief with a Carrotodels is less than five. If you have a strength higher than five without the Carrotodels included, then the Carrotodels is ignored. You can still go over five, much to some reviewers confusion (no names mentioned Tom, ahem!) but if you go over five without the Carrotodels you don't count the five it would usually add. Make sense? Great! If not, don't worry, it will when you play. Chimneys One of my favourite additions that this expansion brings is the Chimneys. There are two in the game, and when drafted, players can build the Chimney onto the Great Cloud Board. Then, during the harvest phase where players score points each round, you can select a basic resource that is present in the Fief that contains the Chimney, and then all of your Fiefs on the original main board can have access to this resource too. Essentially, whatever resource you make up in the clouds can now be thrown down the Chimney for your ground based bunnies to use too! A Fifth set of Bunnies I think the main reason people will buy this expansion is to turn it into a five player game. For that, the main thing you need is more bunnies! The new colour is purple. They look great and stand out perfectly against the board and other red, black, yellow, and pink bunnies from the main game. Which, of course when it comes to end game scoring, is crucial! You need to be able to separate the different colours easily, and this colour works great. Coins The game now has coins. Fans of the base game may wonder how these work, well, its surprisingly simple. They give you points at the end of the game by multiplying the number of coins you have collected by the number of luxury and wonderous resources you managed to get. Simple! But how do you get the coins? And what are wonderous resources? Well, give me a second... There are two main ways to get your paws on the coins. The first is via the Tax Collector card. There are a number of new Parchment cards in this expansion. They function just like the parchment cards in the original, and are all ways to get more points. Apart from the Tax Collector card which simply gets you two coins. The second way to get coins is through creating districts. A district is any fief that contains two or more bunnies. Place one bunny down, all good. Add a second bunny that is orthogonally adjacent to it, you have created a district. Congrats! Take a coin. So, what about those Wonderous resources? Wondrous Resources See that huge Chicken up there? That's a Wonderous resource that is. Produced on a new Luxury farm. There are 12 new cards all with a location on the new board that bring a new Wonderous resource. They act just like the Luxury resources in the main game, and allow players to add extra scoring options to their fiefs. And that's it! A lot more to take in, but it all blends very smoothly with the base game. As with any expansion, I always ask myself three questions when adding something new to a game. Is the game better with this expansion included? Did it add much complexity to the set-up, rule teach, and game play? Would I want to include the expansion every time I play? 1. Is the game better with this expansion included? Yes. I find it hard to judge games with and without expansion sometimes. The experiences are always different. But not necessarily better or worse. With this expansion I would say it is objectively better. I like the extra options it brings. The second board is a nice addition and adds some interesting choices when you are drafting. I find some players will focus on just the main board whereas others will look to the new board for a bulk of points. But either way, coins will be earnt by all players, and this is a huge and fun way to score extra points. 2. Did it add much complexity to the set-up, rule, and game play? No. Its all very simple. Set-up is increased by maybe 30 seconds. The extra rules take perhaps 5 extra minutes to explain to someone who knows the base game. In the actual game, perhaps there is 10 additional minutes added to the game length as more cards are being drafted. However, and this is a bigun'! The end game scoring, which was already quite complicated, especially in a four player, is vastly more complex, especially with a five players. But always with the second board added. Remember those times you were working out which fiefs are connected by a Sky Tower, well you have a lot more of that with the second board and rainbows. It's totally worth it, but I would say this is something to consider. 3. Would I want to include the expansion every time I play? I think I would yes. Certainly when ever I play in a five you will have too. But I think in a two to four I would always chose to add this in. Not for people who hadn't played the base game but definitely with anyone who had a good grasp of the main board. I like what it brings and personally would always prefer to have it included now.

Waterfall Park WBG Score: 7.5 Player Count: 3 - 5 You’ll like this if you like: Chinatown, Sidereal Confluence, Cosmic Encounter Published by: Repos Production Designed by: Karsten Hartwig This is a free review copy. See our review policy here By Steve Godfrey Waterfall Park is a game about building up a floating theme park that has, you guessed it, waterfalls gushing down all four sides! Let’s just hope they’ve got some amazing damp prevention! Regardless of that….Welcome, to Waterfall Park, How to get your ducks in a row. Set up by giving each player five money, a set of plot tiles in their colour and placing the round marker tile to the correct number of players. Deal out a number of cards to each player based on the round tracker for that round. Each player then looks at their cards and discards two. The cards will all show a number corresponding to a plot on the board and a handy picture reference so you can easily find it. All of the discarded cards will get shuffled back into the deck. All players then reveal their cards and will place a plot tile in their colour on each of the spaces of the cards they’ve chosen. The used cards will then get removed from the game. Everyone will then get dealt out a number of attraction tiles (again depending on the round and the player count) which will then get revealed in front of them. Then starts a round of negotiation. You can negotiate with anyone and you can even weigh in on someone else’s negotiation and anything is up for trade. Well, in game anyway. Remember that because I almost lost my house in a trade for some bowling alley tiles. It’s a good thing we checked the rules because my wife would have been mad…….Anyway, in this phase you can trade money, attractions and plots. The only thing you can’t do is trade with tiles that have already been placed and you can’t trade for anything to be removed off the board. Any immediate deals you accept you have to honour. But if you make any deals that resolve in the future, we’ll, then you can feel free to screw over your friends. Just don’t expect them to be friends for much longer if you do. When everyone has finished negotiations each player then places their attractions on their plots. You can place as many of them onto the board as you want and any you don’t are simply kept for the next round. You’ll then score points (money) for any complete and incomplete sets of attractions of your colour. Each attraction type will have a number on them. To complete an attraction you need to have that number in your plots adjacent to each other. Each attraction has enough tiles to make two complete sets. When you score, each incomplete attraction will be worth an amount of money depending how many you have in that set. A complete attraction scores the same way but will be worth more money. Play four rounds and the player with the most money at the end will win. Duck Tiles a woo hoo Negotiation was never a mechanism I thought I’d take too particularly well when I started gaming. However with a few games of Twilight Imperium, Sidereal Confluence and a couple of other games that featured negotiation I'm slowly starting to come around on it. Then Waterfall Park crossed my path and that was a real test of my tolerance for it because it’s pure negotiation. Sidereal Confluence comes close but it’s got other mechanisms that are just as prominent. So with that in mind I think the first thing I should say is, if you don’t like negotiation in any form, for whatever reason, then this is absolutely not the game for you as that’s literally the entire game. So if you want to leave the review now I’ll completely understand. Make sure you leave via the gift shop and check out all of our merch, we’ve got duvet covers….no, seriously! “Let me guess, we’re about to go over a huge waterfall?” “Yep” Still with me? Awesome. When you first read the rules you’ll be forgiven for thinking that the card phase and placing out your plot tiles are just procedural elements of the game. Oh no my friend, In fact this is where you’ll be starting to set up potential trades before the real negotiations have started. It’s not just about keeping which plots are beneficial to you. It’s just as useful to keep cards that you can see your opponents want in order to give you a bargaining tool for later rounds. It’s weird but I find myself hard pushed to keep a little devious smirk from my face as I lay a plot tile in a space that I know someone else is after. Maybe it's a good thing that I’m not in any form or property development, I’m not sure I’d like businessman Steve based on this. Normally when it comes to reviews I try and talk about some of the clever mechanisms, some fun design ideas that have been thrown in to add some in twists and turns or even some great thematic elements. Waterfall Park doesn’t really have any of that. You literally get some cards to choose from, get some tiles and then the designers, much like a teacher who needs an in lesson time break, sits at their desk and hides behind the rule book for a cheeky nap and gets you to discuss amongst yourselves and, when you're done, score up. Now I’m aware that this all sounds really negative, but it’s really not, because this freeing, simple rule set IS the clever twist that makes the game fun, not having intricate and complex rules is what brings the game to life. In fact the rules and freedom it gives you is so much that if it were a shorter game you’d almost be calling it a party game. It doesn’t need to throw in anything fancy to mix things up because the players will be making their own twists and turns while they’re negotiating. The freedom it gives you makes for a more strategic and interactive game than a lot of games with full rule sets that I’ve played. When the negotiation phase starts there’s one hurdle you need to get over though and that’s, who starts first? The first few seconds will no doubt feel like a Western style stand off as you’re all staring at each other wondering who’s going to kick off proceedings. When someone finally takes it upon themselves to start things will go thick and fast and you’ll probably hear someone say “aww I was gonna ask them for that.” which could well be the starting conversation for another trade. One thing is for certain, you need to be quick in this game. Making a deal could be something as simple as a straight swap or it could be something that will take a bit more persuasion and trying to find exactly what will tip other players into making that deal is the name of the game (not literally). The harder they are to break the more satisfying it becomes as you see them slowly start to wear down until finally they relent and the deal is done. Clever people will no doubt try to math out every little offer and hold the game up (luckily it’s not happened In any of my plays) but being as it’s all simultaneous the longer they take the more chance they have of missing out on other potential deals going on around the table. “Sharp rocks at the bottom?” “Most likely” Being a game that’s so reliant on the people around the table, Waterfall park runs the risk of falling flat with the wrong group or even if one player isn’t willing to play in the spirit of the game. It could really bring down a game session so definitely make sure people know what they’re getting into before they play the game. You never know though, this game could be one that brings them out of their negotiation shell and ignites some sort of ruthless trading streak that’s been lying dormant and before you know it they’ll be going on about the price of orange crops (I know a Wolf of Wall Street or Wall Street reference would have been perfect here but I’ve not seen either of them so Trading Places is the best I’ve got.) As the player count goes up so does the chaos of the negotiation. Again this is something that some won’t be for everyone, personally I think it’s a lot of fun, it gives a real trading floor feel, but it’s definitely worth letting people know about. One downside of the chaos is that you may find a few people reaching over each other as they try to move plot tiles and it could be easy for the board to get knocked. In a clever little bit of design the plot tiles have notches on the underside of them and the board has holes in to slot them into to keep the tiles in place. It’s such a great, and let’s face it, fun solution. It doesn’t stop things moving completely however. We’ve certainly dislodged plot tiles on the odd occasion as we’ve been trying to move them around, but It’s a heck of a lot better than having loose tiles on the board. Theme wise it’s fine. I’ve not played the original Chinatown that this is a reprint of but I’ve seen it and I much prefer the look of this one. Quite honestly it could have been any theme but I personally like the fact that they’ve gone for something as fun as this. It’s a fun production, the coloured plot tiles make it really easy to determine what belongs to who and it’s certainly made it a more appealing looking game to try and entice more people to look into it. Plus the board looks great when it’s all filled up at the end of the game. “Bring it on” TLC once sang “don’t go chasing waterfalls” and while I agree that chasing a non moveable body of water is folly, I do think that if negotiation is your thing then you may want to go chasing after Waterfall Park.

Cytosis WBG Score: 8.5 Player Count: 2-5 You’ll like this if you like: Century Spice Road, Raiders of the North Sea, Viticulture Published by: Genius Games Designed by: John Coveyou This is a review copy. See our review policy here Cytosis is a game set within the cell of a human. It has been developed by countless doctors and scientists, and offers a unique educational experience within a board game setting. From my limited understanding of the science behind this, everything is accurate, if a little simplified. But there is a learning opportunity there for sure. Although I would argue, the benefit is more to inspire and intrigue a younger audience than fully educate. But then this is just a board game after all. But is the game any good? Let's get it to the table and find out. How To Set Up Cytosis There are two sides to the board. One for a two-player game, and the other for three, four, or five players. Pick the side you need and place this onto the center of the table. Then take all the macromolecule cubes, separate them into their four different types, and place them into separate piles, along with a separate pile for the ATP tokens. Next, separate the deck of cards into the three types; Event cards, Goal cards, and Cell Component cards. Shuffle each deck separately, then deal 10 events cards into a face-down deck for a two or three-player game, 11 for a four-player game, and five for a 12-player game. This will act as the game clock, when the final one is drawn, that will be the last round. Then choose three, four, or five random goal cards for a two, three, or four or higher game. And place these face up next to the main board. Then deal four face-up cards from the Cell component deck onto the spaces for them at the bottom of the main board. If you are playing with two players note you need to remove three Alcohol Detoxification cards before you do this, placing them back into the box. Then deal each player three of the Cell component cards. All players will choose to keep two from these three, discarding the third card, creating a discard pile next to the rest of the deck in the process. All players will then take the four flasks (three in a four-player game and just two in a five-player) two Transport Vesicle disks, and three markers in their player colour, placing one of the markers on the zero space on the Health score tracker. Give one player the first player token and two ATP tokens, The next player takes three tokens, the next four, and so on. All players can now choose to take two additional resources from the ATP token, black mRNA cubes, or the yellow Lipids cubes. Finally, place the two grey flasks onto the space for them on the main board. These can be used at any time by any player during any round for an additional action, just pay the shown cost. You are now ready to play. How To Play Cytosis This is a classic-style worker placement game, where players will take turns placing one of their Flasks onto one of the many worker placement spots on the main board to carry out that action. The game flows over multiple rounds, tracked by the Event deck, with players placing all their flasks each round. As players place their flasks, one at a time, in turn order, they will carry out the action shown at the space where they position their flask. This is mainly to get resources, new cards, process and then complete the cell components cards, or take the first player marker for the next round. Taking resources or cards is easy. Simply place your flask in the appropriate space and take the card, for the shown cost (the far left card is always free), or for a resource; take as many as are shown, or pay the appropriate cost for the available exchange. For example, at the Mitochondria, you can take three or two ATP for free, or pay one green Carbohydrate cube to take six ATP tokens. In classic worker placement style, the spaces are at a premium, and the first person to go to each area typically gets the best deal. Going first and planning your turn order is crucial. Resources are taken to complete Enzyme, Hormone, or Alcohol Detoxification cards. This is done by paying the shown resources on the card in exchange for the benefit at the bottom, namely, health points. The Enzyme and Alcohol Detoxification cards are fairly self-explanatory, but the Hormone cards take a little more explanation. You first need to place your flask into the appropriate space, based on which card you are looking to complete. This is clearly shown on the board itself. Then place one of your Transport Vesicle disks onto the open space in this area and then exchange the necessary amount of black mRNA cubes for the required amount of red Protein cubes. Place these onto the Transport Vesicle disk you just placed here. On a subsequent turn, place a second Flask into the lower area where you can now add in the other Macromolecules. Either adding green Carbohydrates or yellow Lipid cubes. Finally, on a third turn, place a third Flask into the Plasma Membrane area, place the card you are completing face up on the table for all to see, pay the required ATP costs, remove the Macromolecules on the Transport Vesicle disk, and gain the shown points. When you complete the Steroid or Hormone cards, you and other players will also score one or two points for each previously completed card of the same type. Enzymes simply score you a set number of points, but will then score additional bonus points based on how many you completed in the entire game at the end, shown on the bottom of the card. And the Alcohol Detoxification cards score one point at the time of completion, but then extra points at the end of the game based on how many you did in comparison to the other players, again as shown on the card. In a two-player game, note the bonus scores for these cards are just five and two. Ignore the eight-point max. The only other thing you will be doing during the game is placing your colour cubes onto the goal cards. There are a few choices here, and the first person to place their cube on each one will score an immediate Health point bonus, so it pays to move fast here. Although you will then commit early to that goal. Typically these are about completing different types of cards and will reward you with additional points at the end of the game based on how many of those cards you completed. Focusing you on those cards for the remainder of the game. Once all players have used all of their flasks, you will move into the refresh phase. Here, all players will retrieve their Flasks, ready to be used again in the next round. Then remove the leftmost Cell component card, slide any remaining cards to the left and add in more from the deck so it is full again. Then reveal the top card from the Event deck and read it aloud to all players. This will typically affect the next round by adding in a bonus resource into one area of the board or reduce the ATP cost of the Cell Component cards for the upcoming round. A new round begins, unless there were no new event cards, in which case final scoring now occurs. All players will score one point for any group of four black mRNA cubes or yellow Lipid cubes, one point for any three red Protein cubes, and one point for any two green Carbohydrate cubes. Players then total the amount of Alcohol Detoxification cards they completed and score the shown points based on the player count. Then total the completed Enzyme cards and score based on your personal completed amount. Two points for two cards. Up to 14 points for five completed Enzyme cards. Finally, check the Goal cards and total any points scored here by all players who put cubes there during the game. The most health points wins. Is It Fun? Cytosis Board Game Review This game was first published in 2017, which is important for the context of this review. The game itself is fantastic - a tight, perfectly executed worker placement game with interesting scoring options, satisfying turns, and a novel and well-executed theme. However, it really does offer nothing new in the grand scheme of things. This game came out five years after Lords of Waterdeep, a game that really set the tone for modern Worker Placement games. You can read more about this game and its mechanisms here. So, some may expect more. Modern-day games need to stand out for one of three reasons: They offer something new mechanically. They do something old, but better. They offer a unique, interesting, or well-executed theme. I would say Cytosis only really ticks the final box here. But I still rate it an 8.5. This is because I review games in isolation. This game is an 8.5. It doesn't offer that much new. Many other games have done similar things before. And it doesn't necessarily develop these old tricks in any meaningful way. But it does execute them well, and the game as a standalone entity is good. I offer the context for your benefit, depending on if you have many other worker placement games on your shelves already. In that case, I would suggest the theme is the main criteria here. And if you are into this theme, then get this game. If not, and you already own other worker placement games, this may not be for you. Personally, I like it in my collection as a natural progression from Century Spice Road, to teach new gamers about modern games, mechanics, and get them into our hobby. I own many other Worker Placement games, but I will keep this in my collection for two others reasons. I like the theme, but I the thing I enjoy most about this, is the way they have executed the progress of the Cell Component cards which is incredibly satisfying. AS I mention above, it feels like Century Spice Road in that you are collecting a certain resource and exchanging it for another. But instead of this being in a simple set-collection, hand-management game; it is done in a worker placement style game. Hence is being a perfect follow on to this game for new gamers. But that also means that it scratches multiple itches as I play, because completing these cards, much like in Century Spice Road, is not easy, which brings me to my second reason. The game is incredibly tight. There is only one space to complete the cards on the two-player side of the board, and just two on the three-player or more side. I like my worker placement games to bring an element of a race to it, which this game does so well! Let's look at a typical turn in any given round. A new Event card has just made the Carbohydrate production in the Plasma Membrane double as efficient, but only for the first player. The first free card is incredibly juicy, the only one of its type currently face up available, and you really want it. But all three spaces in the Rough ER and Smooth ER are full, and there are only two spots in the Golgi Apparatus which you know people in the Rough ER and Smooth ER are going to want to progress down to. If you don't take one of those, you may miss out on your chance this round to complete your current Cell Component card. And don't forget, the first space at the Nucleus, Mitochondria, and Smooth ER all reward higher than the second, getting their first matters. And of course, only one person per round can add a goal marker to the goal cards and claim the first player token. There is a lot of choice. It is all good. And you can only pick one. Beautifully tight! I really enjoy my time with this game and would recommend it to anyone who finds the theme interesting. It executes it very well, comes with a separate manual explaining all the terms, (so can be used as a teaching aid with your children), and plays incredibly smoothly. As mentioned, it doesn't necessarily offer anything new in this field, but if you want a pure player worker placement game, with satisfying scoring, and an incredibly tight and rewarding feeling as you play, you can't go wrong with this game. Lords of Waterdeep, is still the granddaddy here for me in this mechanic, but Cytosis will be my new go-to when it comes to teaching people this mechanic if they are looking for something simple, easy to teach, fun to play, and they find this theme interesting. Lords of Waterdeep is potentially a little alienating in this way, as the theme is so typically 'fantasy'. Which obviously isn't everyone's cup of tea. Whereas science is real, and perhaps a little more accessible and appealing to some newer gamers.

Ecosystem WBG Score: 8 Player Count: 2-6 You’ll like this if you like: Misty, Cascadia, Azul Published by: Genius Games Designed by: Matt Simpson This is a review copy. See our review policy here Ecosystem is a remarkably straightforward game that you can easily grasp, understand, explain, and play in less than thirty minutes. After playing, you'll likely feel calm, content, and perhaps even a little bit more knowledgeable. It appears that this game was designed with this in mind, and it succeeds. Setting aside the fact that shuffling so many cards of this size without damaging them can be quite a task, I am a fan. But how does it play? Let's bring it to the table and see. How To Set Up Ecosystem Shuffle the cards and then deal out ten cards to each player. Give each player a scoring aid. You are now ready to start playing! How To Play Ecosystem Players will now choose one card from the ten in their hand to keep. They will place this face down in front of them, starting their own personal ecosystem. When all players have chosen, pass the remaining nine cards to the player to your left and flip over the card you just placed face down so that it is now face up. Now choose one card from the nine in hand and do the same thing, passing the remaining eight left. Continue until all cards have been chosen and all players have ten cards in front of them. Cards must be placed adjacent to a previously played card. This is orthogonal, not diagonal. So, to the left, right, or above or below a previously played card. In total, you will create a five by four grid. Five along, four down. So, you must also not break this size. When this is done, grab another load of cards, deal ten more to each player, and run round two just as you did round one, but now passing to your right. When round two is over, score your ecosystem using the handy score sheet. Players will go through each animal, scoring them in turn. Players will then total all cards that had no effect. Players will then score based on their ineffective cards. The Diversity scoring. To see how each card scores, take a look at the below guide. Is It Fun? Ecosystem Card Game Review Ecosystem is one of those simple small box games that you always are happy to play. It's simple but rewarding. Small but substantial. And I always want more after one game. The distillation of drafting and tableau building is a classic mix in card games, and with this theme, you will be instantly absorbed in your new little world that is being formed right in front of you. You can play this game so many different ways. Getting into the stream or Meadow game early can make the chase for those cards, as well as those that work with it such as the Dragonfly and Trout a real battle. As you make your Ecosystem, you can see the other players own tableau forming at the same time. You will start to get an idea as to what they are chasing as well as be on the lookout for the cards you want for your own area. Do you take the Stream card now, knowing there were none left in the hand of cards you just passed to your left, but there is only one trout card in this hand? Will anyone else take this card before it comes back around to you again? There is something so therapeutic about playing this game. Even when your Ecosystem is not quite working out as you like, it still looks beautiful. But when it clicks and all comes together, which it usually does, it feels wildly satisfying. There is generally a good card, and as much as you won't always win, you will often create some interesting combos and get a decent score. However, the final three to four cards can often catch people out. Your options for where you place cards at this point are obviously limited. And the type of card that could be placed to score well, or score at all becomes significantly reduced. The Diversity point system really comes into effect here. I would recommend this game to anyone who likes set collection, tableau building, or drafting games, and is looking for something that they can get out and play quickly in most situations. It works in the pub, as a filler at game night, or a light family game.

Wyrmspan WBG Score: 8.5 Player Count: 1-5 You’ll like this if you like: Wingspan, Everdell, Lost Ruins of Arnak Published by: Stonemaier Games Designed by: Connie Vogelmann This is a review copy. See our review policy here Wingspan is one of the best selling games of the modern era. It has won numerous awards and is widely regarded as one of the best gateway games in terms of bring new players to the hobby. My review for Wingspan can be found here. When a publisher has a huge hit like this, it is rare they leave it alone. And Wingspan has seen seen a number of expansions, add-ns, and even a two-player version. You can read more about that here. But when at the start of 2024, the publisher announced there was to be a new version of the game, offering a slightly higher complexity, aimed at a more serious gamer, called Wyrmspan, you would be excused at confusing this release with something a lot more controversial. Some people seemed outraged at this idea. Why, when games like Ticket to Ride and Pandemic have multiple versions out, this was a surprise to anyone is beyond me. But this seems to be the curse that successful publishers like Stonemaier Game have to suffer. They are criticised for most things they do, seemingly just because they are seen as being big and successful. Interestingly this all seemed to begin with Wingspan. Simply because of it's huge success. Stonemaier were seen as more indie prior to then. as nothing has changed. Since Wingspan, Stonemaier have seen mixed success with their releases. Games like Red Rising and Pendulum have received muted responses from critics. Tapestry was attacked for its over production and lack of balance. Libertalia was criticised for lacking the heart of the original. And Expeditions has been suggested by some to be a cash grab based on the success of Scythe (the original game this release shared a theme and art style with) and failure of the previous releases, just mentioned. But all are good games. It seems some people cannot see beyond the trolls and bandwagon that all started from the huge success Wingspan brought to the publisher and now cannot just judge each game for what it is. They look for problems. Or simply it's because people just enjoy hating on Stonemaier as it is seen as cool. It's hard to like the big guy, right? The Coldplay effect in full force. But again, that's odd as Stonemaier are hardly big. They have three full time employees. They are nothing compared to Cool Mini Or Not or Asmodee. I prefer to simply judge each game on its own merits. Not the history or legacy of the publisher. So, that is what I will do here. BUT! I would say I am a fan of Jamey Stegmaier, and Stonemaier games. So, perhaps I have a different bias pushing me the other direction? All I would say on that is this. I own over 700 games in my collection, and know which ones I get to the table most, and I only pick the games I want to play. I certainly play games more when I first get them so I can review them, but I know which ones then see repeat plays after I hit publish. And all these criticised Stonemaier games have seen many repeat plays since the pressure of the review has gone. With all that said, Wyrmspan is a very interesting game on it's own merits. But it has to be looked at within this context. There is an important history that I believe is worth being aware of to help judge this game, and assess my own ability to critique it fairly. So, after the longest introduction in the history of What Board Game, let's get this game to the table and see how it plays. How To Set Up Wyrmspan First place the Dragon Guild Board on the table. Randomly pick one of the four Dragon Guild tiles and put it on the middle of the board with your chosen side up, depending on how many players there are. Then shuffle all the Dragons cards together and put three of them face up on the card display board in the marked spots. Keep the rest of Dragon deck nearby, face down. Do the same with the Cave cards. Next, place the round Tracker Board down with the round marker on the first round space. Mix up the objective tiles and put four of them randomly onto this board with a random side up for each one. Put the rest back in the box. Now set up the public supply by putting all the coins, eggs, and tokens in a spot where everyone can reach them. Each player will now take a player mat and place it in front of them. Put your starting resources of six coins and eight player markers, on the left side of your mat. Take one egg and place it on one of the two nest icons on your player mat. Place your Adventurer on the space on your board marked as Base Camp. Then put your guild token on the starting Dragon Guild space. Now deal three Dragon cards and three Cave cards to each player. Everyone can choose to keep any four of these six cards. Discard the rest. All players can now choose any three starting resources based on the cards they chose to keep. Give the starting player token to the last person to ride a Dragon, or a random player; your choice. You are now ready to begin. How To Play Wyrmspan If you have played Wingspan then a lot of the below will be familiar to you. I have managed to teach Wyrmspan to people who have played Wingspan in around five minutes. I do this by highlighting the differences. Then talking through the three main actions. Let's do the same now. Much like Wingspan, players will take turns to carry out one action per turn over four rounds. But whereas in Wingspan you do this with an action cube, in Wyrmspan this is done by spending coins. Players start with six coins and will get six new coins each round. You can save coins round to round if you want, but I doubt you ever will. And you can get extra coins during rounds through certain card and Guild effects, but these won't carry over to later rounds unless you save them. You can never start a round with less than six or more than nine coins. On your turn, you will place a coin on your player mat by the action you want to do, then carry out that action. On the left of the mat, it shows you your three main options: Excavate, Entice, and Explore. Let's go through them now one by one. Excavate is a whole new action compared to Wingspan. To Entice Dragons to your player board, they first need a cave to live in. Excavate is how you do this. Simply pay a coin and egg (if needed depending on the column) and place a Cave card from your hand onto the leftmost space on one of the three rows on your board. The first space on each row will have a Cave already present, so you don't need to Excavate there. Cave cards have a when-played power that you can now activate. Entice is how you get Dragons onto your board and is very similar to adding birds in Wingspan. You will pay one coin then the shown cost on the dragon card itself, placing any required resources from your personal supply back into the main supply. The Dragon card will show which of the three rows it can go to, ensure you pick a legal space. Some Dragons have a when-played action, others will show end-of-round or end-of-game abilities, or powers that activate when you explore. Explore is similar to activating Birds in Wingspan when you carry out certain rows actions. Here, explore is its own specific action. Pay a coin, then take your Adventurer meeple from its position on your player mat, pick one of the three rows you want to explore, and place it on the first Explore icon on that row. Then move your Adventurer right to left, stopping at each Adventure symbol until you see a red hexagon with a white line in the middle. The top row will help you gain resources. The middle is about Dragon cards. The bottom is about Cave cards. As you place more Dragon cards down on each row, this action becomes stronger as your Adventurer can move further right, as the Dragon cards not only bring new Explore powers but block the symbol that shows where you have to stop when Adventuring. Whenever you see the Dragon Guild symbol, you can move your guild token one space clockwise around the Guild track. You will then take the shown item or resource. Whenever you move to the bottom or top space, you can move a colored cube into one of the boxed spaces on the Guild tile. This will give you an instant or end-of-game bonus. This is the main addition from Wingspan and introduces a lot of new ways to combo turns. Players will continue placing coins and taking one of these three actions until they run out of coins or choose to stop. Then you will run through the phases shown on the round tracker board. First, each player will activate all end-of-round Dragon cards they have on their player mat. Then players will score based on that round's objective. Then all Cave cards and Dragon cards on the display board are refreshed, before finally all players getting six new coins and one egg. The next round will then take place. After the end of the fourth round, the player with the most points wins. Is It Fun? Wyrmspan Board Game Review If you like Wingspan, you will most probably like this. The game is a little better with the added element, such as the Dragon Guild. But two big things will affect your opinion. Do you like Dragons more or less than birds? Are you happy about Wingspan getting this treatment? A lot of people prefer the real-world nature of Wingspan. Some like the mystical fantasy Wyrmspan brings. Some may not mind at all and just enjoy the enhanced mechanics. Some are very loyal to Wingspan and find this adapted version hard to accept. Others enjoy the fact that one of the most popular games in the modern-day hobby has a new version and are excited to see how this develops. If you have some prior knowledge of Wingspan, then let the above affect your opinion. If you don't like Wingspan, I doubt this will change your mind that much about the mechanics of the game. I think it is a little better myself and see the improvements that have been made. The luck of the dice tower being removed. The control with the Guild being added. Just as two examples. But 90% of the game is the same and if you don't like one, the other won't be that different. Unless of course, it was simply the theme of Wingspan that you did not enjoy. In which case, how do you feel about Dragons? Another major factor in this will be the art and card layout. Some say it is busy. Others are not fans of the light, airy watercolor style. Personally, I like it. I think it suits the game. The Dragons looked gorgeous in my opinion. And the card layout is very clear. I don't like the lack of space for eggs. When you start adding multiple eggs to the cards, you do block the art somewhat. But this is merely aesthetic. You can keep the important text at the bottom open. But Dragon size and personality matter towards the round objectives. And it is easy for eggs to block these stats. Making it harder for other players to see and track how you are doing on these round goals. The solo mode is excellent, runs very smoothly, and offers an interesting challenge. In a two-player game, the game flows well and is my ideal number to play this in. Three and up work fine, but there can be some downtime as players start to really combo their turns in the later stages. It can be frustrating to wait when you are eager to carry out a cool turn of your own. Take your own personality into account here! And on those combos. Oh my! This is where Wingspan really shines. And I have found with my plays of Wyrmspan so far that I have been able to get this working a lot quicker. A lot more effectively. And with a lot more satisfaction. There are fewer card spaces to fill in Wyrmspan compared to Wingspan. Most games you will complete your board, or at least come close. The most empty spaces I have seen at the end of the game so far was four. I would say usually players average two or three empty spaces by the end. More cards mean more powers. And completing rows is easier with one less space per row. The end of row bonus in Wyrmspan gets you another coin, which is an extra turn. In Wingspan, as the game moves on, you will have one less turn per round as you use your turn cubes to track your end of round objective score. In Wyrmspan, you always have the same amount of turns as a minimum each round. But tend to get more as your card powers and end of row bonus kick in. That, for me, is more fun. The combo options provided by the Hatchling cards alone are worth the entry fee to this game. They work a little differently from the other cards in the game, whereby they increase in power the more often they are activated. Typically maxing out their power on the third activation. There are some pretty clever ways that you will be able to activate these a number of times during each game, providing you with extra cards, resources, and points, that in turn will begin to combo with other cards, creating a cascading effect of combo turns in the mid to late game. It is for this reason that I rate Wyrmspan slightly higher than Wingspan, and I am a fan of Wingspan. Personally, I much prefer the real-world nature of Wingspan. Learning about the birds as I play is a great joy to me. The made-up nature of Wyrmspan is fine. It's just less interesting. And the attempted world-building in the supplementary Dragon facts booklet is very odd. To avoid cluttering the cards, the information of the Dragons is taken from the card itself and instead, placed into a glossy 32-page booklet. A good idea to keep the cards clean. But utterly pointless because I have zero interest in learning facts about made-up Dragons in a game where the lore is redundant. No harm in the booklet being in the box, but it must add to cost and this game is not the cheapest. I understand why it is in the box, but it seems odd and superfluous to me. That said, if you judge Wyrmspan on its own, it is a very good game. But no one will do that. It will always be judged against Wingspan. And I suppose rightly so. It just adds to me why this happens so much more for games like that, over the multiple versions of Ticket to Ride and Pandemic that we see that seem to bother no one. But even when judging against Wingspan, Wyrmspan is still very good. A little better. So, the one to get if you only buy one and are not judging on theme. But do you need both? Well, that's up to you. For me, I do as I am a completist and own every Stonemaier game to date. But would I buy this on its own merits even if I was not such a Stonemaier fanboy and already owned Wingspan? Yes. I like the options both bring and how I can bring either out based on who I am playing with. But if I only planned to play solo, had to pick just one, or was judging this based on which one was the best game, Wyrmspan wins for me every day of the week.

Wingspan Asia WBG Score: 8.5 Player Count: 1-2 (1-7 with base game) You’ll like this if you like: Everdell, Lost Ruins of Arnak, Furnace. Published by: Stonemaier Games Designed by: Elizabeth Hargrave I am a huge Stonemaier fan, and this game was provided for free for purposes of review. But this has in no way affected my opinion or score, but I want to declare that here for transparency. Wingspan first came out in 2019. You can read my review here. There have been two expansions for this hugely popular game so far. First, the European expansion which offered new cards, and then the Oceania expansion, which added yet more cards, a new player board, and a new food type. Now, we have the third expansion, Asia. It brings more cards, a 6-7 player flock expansion, and a whole new stand-alone two player duet mode. Let's get it to the table and see how it plays. Set Up The main feature of this expansion is the two player Flock mode. This allows for two people to play a full game of Wingspan using components exclusively from this box. The main game is not required. It does not quite have all the rat-a-ma-taz of the full game. The component wow factor from the bird feeder dice tower is certainly gone. But it works incredibly well, is very simple to set-up, and will allow for quicker two players games in future. Duet Mode To play in this mode, lay out the boards for the dice, flock tokens, and cards in the centre of the table, placing three cards face up on the board the cards, leaving the rest in a shuffled face down pile. Place four random goal tiles onto the duet board. Then give each player a game mat, eight cubes of their chosen colour, two bonus cards to choose one from, and the 15 duet tokens; which are placed on each bird space on their board. Then deal each player five bird cards and one each of the five food tokens. A total of ten items. Players need to decide which of these they want to keep. Just like the main gave, players can keep five of these ten items in any combination. Generally looking to keep the food needed to place their first bird card. Perhaps their second too. Place the rest of the food tokens into a general supply, alongside the other goal cards, and randomly decide which player will go first, giving them the first player token. You are now ready to play. How to Play The game plays exactly like the main game so I won't go into the full rules here. The only difference is the duet board. Each time you place a bird, you will carry out all the usual actions. The only change will be that as you place the card on your board, you will also remove the duet token that there. This will then be placed onto the duet board. At the end of the game you will score one point for your largest grouping of touching duet tokens on the duet board. There are also some spaces that give immediate bonuses such as extra food, cards, and eggs. When you place the duet token, you must place the token into the matching area that the bird was placed into on your board. Also matching either the size of the bird, type of nest, food used to place it, or the direction of its beak on the card. The quick-start guide provided (picture below) is an excellent way to learn the game if you have not played before. Or it can act as a quick refresher if you have not played for a while. Simply give the guides out to each player, run through the set up changes, which affects the cards and food tokens you get, and then run through the steps. It is a truly fantastic way to play Wingspan Asia for the first time, and just like the quick start guide in the base game, gives you everything you need to learn the full game in under one round. Well done to all involved. All games should have this. The other main change in the game is the Flock mode, which can be used to to turn Wingspan and Wingspan Asia into a six or seven player game. Flock Mode In order to speed up the process, in this player count, you will need to have two simultaneous players at any time. This is done by setting the table up as such that you will split the players into two groups of either two threes, or one three and one four depending on player count. Using components from both games, each group will have its own dice and cards to draw from. No "pass me the dice here." Another reason this expansion comes with its own complete set of resources to play this game. Clever huh!? The below turn dial is used. Both pieces are doubled sided to show either six or seven players. As you turn the dial, it will show which two players should be active at each time. Another nice little touch to help remind players when they are active, and speed the process along. Crucial in a six or seven player game. There are not many games of this ilk, size, complexity, and length I would contemplate playing with this many people. Not that Wingspan is that complex, it's just anything above three or four players and I generally move away from anything above light weight. It just gets too long and boring. Here, you can see how the designers have done everything they can to keep the game flowing. It is Fun? A lot of what makes Wingspan so popular, is the gorgeous card art. And a lot of people will want to get this expansion simply to get their hands on the Crested Lark and friends. Just look at them! We also have round end powers now which I love, and are clearly identified by the turquoise blue colour The new powers seem well balanced with the existing cards and offer a nice variety, with lots of new ways to get more food. I would strongly recommend this game to anyone. No matter if you have Wingspan already or not. It is a brilliant way to get this game to the table in a two-player with or without the base game. If you don't own Wingspan, now is your chance to get it for a great cost. If you do own Wingspan, it's your choice if you think you will play the game in a two or six plus. The main benefit of this expansion. If you will exclusively only ever play Wingspan in a 3-4 or solo then perhaps this is not for you. But I would say that is quite a niche audience. As such, I would rate this as by far the best expansion for Wingspan so far, and perhaps even more essential a purchase than the base game. Seeing as it's cheaper more accessible and so good in a two player. I keep saying expansion, which this is. But it also a brilliant stand alone two-player version of Wingspan it's own right.

Wingspan WBG Score: 8 Player Count:1-6 You’ll like this if you like: Everdell, Lost Ruins of Arnak, Furnace. Published by: Stonemaier Games Designed by: Elizabeth Hargrave I cannot imagine there are many people within the hobby who have not heard of Wingspan by now. Card Game of the year 2020. Kennerspiel des Jahres Winner in 2019. Swiss Gamers Award Winner in 2019. Wingspan certainly is one of the big hitters of the modern era. But, if you are new to the hobby, somehow missed this one, or just interested in how WBG see's this mighty game, then read on. I hope to have a fresh take for you. Let's get it to the table and see how it plays. Set Up I won't go into the full set up in this review. There is a great video here if you want the full 'Rodney' details. Suffice to say, the game comes with a lot of components that make setting up this game a lot easier. Such as the card tray which holds everything neatly when in the box, and then displays three cards beautifully when set up. The trays the food tokens come in are equally useful for both storage and set-up. Place all these out now around the table. In the box there is also bird feeder dice tower. This looks stunning, is easily assembled for your first play, and fits back into the box fully made so you won't have to dismantle and re-make each time. Place this out now with the dice in it and give each player a board and cubes of their chosen colour. How To Play Again, I won't go into the full rules here. The video above will do a better job for that. But I will cover the basics to give you a flavour. On your turn, you will be able to do one of four options. Placing one or your coloured cubes on your board as you go to show how many turns you have left. The first option you can choose is to play a bird card from your hand onto your board, paying the appropriate food and egg cost shown the card you are placing and column you are placing it into. Then lay the card into the best suited environment on your board. If the bird has an immediate effect you can use this now. The second option is to gain food, gaining the symbols on the left most uncovered slot in the top woodland area on your board. Generally here you can chose the food shown on one of the dice. The food is used to feed the birds when you place them in the above first option. The bird cards, when placed, will make later turns in each row more powerful. The order you do everything is crucial. Sometimes this game literally is Chicken and egg. The third option is to gain eggs. The forth is to draw new bird cards. Again, you will spend a cube and take the amount of eggs or cards as shown on the left most available space on your player board. The more birds placed on your board, the more powerful your subsequent turns become. When placing birds, you can also activate any birds in that row that have any relevant brown "when activated" powers. So, the order in which you place the birds is also important. Each round has its own specific bonus to aim for, such as a certain amount of eggs or birds in a specific habitat. You can either score this based on who scored the most each round, or a more friendly way where all players can score the maximum bonus if they achieved five of the specific task. A player will mark this using one of their action cubes. Once this is done, all players will take back all their other remaining cubes from the board, replenish all face up bird cards on the display, and start the next round. The game runs like this for four rounds. As such, each round you will have access to one less cube to use as an action. So, as the game develops, your actions will have to be carefully considered. The later rounds will fly by! Players will often want one or two more turns to complete certain scoring options in their early games. It has that delightful frustration of wanting to do a little bit more. After the final round, players will score points for all bird cards on their board. Each player will score points as per their own bonus score card given to them at the start of the game and any subsequent bonus cards they may have gained during the game. Then each player will add the points scored from the mid round goals, and one point for every egg, cached food token, and tucked card on their player board. The highest score wins! Is it Fun (Bear with me, we will get there...) Wingspan has a huge fan base. I think this is down to three main things: First, Wingspan is a gorgeous looking game. The art on the cards is stunning. Each one of the 170 cards is unique and shows a beautiful, accurate picture of a real bird. People like this. It feels educational, but not boring. It is interesting, true to life, and visually pleasing. The box art is also wonderful. Clean. And instantly striking. On a shelf, people would be intrigued to find out more. Second, Wingspan plays well, incorporating some solid mechanisms in a highly accessible way. Mix the visual appeal with solid gameplay and you have the scale to win fan voted awards. Winning awards gain more sales, and a positive cycle of new games being sold and new fans coming to the game begins. Finally, I think Wingspan grew to have such a huge following because it is good. But there are a lot of people out there that love it, and some that really don't. When anything gets this big, it will inevitably polarise opinion. Often, the extremes are more emotionally led, and I find a mean average can help. But those extremes sure do create a lot of hype. And that brings more sales too. So the art draw attention. The attention draw fans. The fans draw awards. The awards drew more fans. And the whole time, it turns out the game is good too. Hmmm... Let's tale a quick look at those extremes for a moment though. The people that absolutely love Wingspan, may come from a few groups. One such group may be those that have been introduced to modern gaming through popular games like Wingspan, but haven't played that many others, and so find it incredible compared to other older "classic" games. This is a wonderful thing. Well done to Wingspan for bring so many more fans to this great hobby of ours. But this may explain why some views are so high in comparison. I would also wager, there is a large group of fans of Wingspan who come to be such passionate supporters of the game due to the theme. Twitcher's, birders, and ornithologist's. Drawn to the game by the setting alone. Prior to Wingspan, there really were not that many mass market games about birds, believe it or not! Their opinions would be positively biased by their love for a previously neglected topic within games. In the way that a mean average works, I would suggest we can discount these hard-core fans opinions to get a more balanced review for the masses. I am not discounting their genuine and absolutely sound love for this game. I am just using a mean average for the purposes of a review, and a rather laboured point. So, for balance, let's look at the other side of the fence. There seem to be two main groups of people who really do not like Wingspan. The first is those who find anything that gets this big, hard to love. People who will avoid popular bands, films, and books, simply as they get huge press or mass market attention. Wingspan won a lot of awards and with that, put a lot of people off. Not just because some people avoid the popular, or obvious, but also because these awards were a popularity contest, rather than an objective result of mass game testing. It was frustrating to some that Wingspan won best card game for example. It sure does use a lot of cards, and they are fundamental to the core mechanics of the game. But many would argue that Wingspan is not a card game per-se. Catch me at my most pedantic, and I may be inclined to agree with that! So, this can turn some away. The second group who seem quite passionate about this games inability to tickle there own personal gaming itch, are those perhaps more familiar with the hobby prior to Wingspan coming out. And perhaps they enjoy more mid or heavy weight games, and they find Wingspan to be too light. Frustrated by such a simple games popularity, they become irritated by so many people thinking that "this is what modern board games is about." They want people to experience a deeper game. To try something with more weight. And feel Wingspan stops people from trying what they may see as a more true reflection of modern board games. I don't necessarily subscribe to all these points, but I certainly can see merit in all these arguments. But, I raise them purely to work towards a mean average. However, let's look at the stats. On BoardGameGeek there are 176 ratings of 1 currently recorded as per the day of writing. There are 138 scores of Two and 307 scores of three. Now, let's compare that to the scores of 10 which currently stands at 9,600! There are 15,000 scores of nine, and 25,000 scores of 8, the mean average starts to climb up a bit. And the low scores and arguments start to get somewhat drowned out! I wonder how many people reading this would be shocked by the above. I thought, personally, that there would be far more lower scores. The vitriol for this game being so loud in the industry. But, I suppose that is because, like all things in life, sadly the negative reviews and lower scores can often be shouted with a much louder voice I would wager, although I have nothing to back this up on, that there are many more people from the positive categories I mentioned above that have not scored Wingspan at all on websites like this, as they are not on BoardGameGeek. Even more people who are new to the hobby that would add their own 8's, 9's, and 10's but are not doing so, simply as they are new to the hobby and not on BGG yet. Whereas the active gamers who dislike Wingspan due to their many years in the hobby almost certainly would be present on scoring sites like this, in much higher numbers. So, you could argue there are many more unscored "Ten's" out there, than there are unscored "One's". Maybe Wingspan isn't as polarising as we have been lead to believe. The numbers certainly don't back it up. Maybe it's just good? Well, that was all very interesting. If a little subjective! But it didn't really answer the question, Is this fun? And to save this argument between myself continuing, I will answer that now. Yes, Wingspan is fun. I felt it needed some context, considering this review is coming three years after it's release. A lot has been said about this game, both in the VERY positive. And also in the VERY negative. I wanted to find a balance. In trying to understand why the extremes exist, whilst looking for the facts to see if those extremes are as balanced as I had been lead to believe. But what I am left with, after the dust has settled, is just a solid game. One that looks great. Is produced to very high standards. (That admittedly perhaps increases the cost a little too far, another irritant for some). But that delivers a stunning table presence that has brought many new people to tabletop gaming. For that alone, Wingspan deserves a lot of credit. But let's tale away all the hype, awards, history and criticism and just look at the game. Wingspan is a good, low to mid-weight game that incorporates some interesting card play, clever engine building, that is coupled with an interesting depleting action selection mechanic, with multiple ways to score. As a game on its own, it is solid. If you like birds, you will love it. If you are new to the hobby and want something accessible that takes you to the next step, this could be a firm favourite for you. If you enjoy hand-management and simple tableau building, this may be the one for you. My advice, ignore the hype and give it a try. One of your friends probably already has a copy. It sold loads don't you know?

Mythwind WBG Score: 8 Player Count: 1-4 You’ll like this if you like: Stardew Valley, a hot cup of Coco with a blanket by the fire. Published by: Open Owl Studios Designed by: Nathan Lige, Brendan McCaskell This is the reviewer's copy after I backed the Kickstarter but the publisher sent me a play mat and Sprite miniatures upgrade for free. See our review policy here. I have played the game with all four available characters, but there is a fifth expansion character I don't have. I have played in solo mostly, but also two-player. Mythwind is a fascinating game. You cannot win this game, and you can't really ever finish it, although it can run out of new content. It is set in the mystical fantasy realm of Mythwind, a lush, peaceful valley inhabited by mysterious Sprites. Your job is to take control of one of four characters and, well... do a few odd jobs. General town improvements and minor goal completion are the aim, along with some narrative-driven storytelling. Let's get it to the table and see how it plays. How to Set Up Mythwind The main board is comprised of three parts that slot together nicely, left to right. Place these down on the main table along with the main town tray. In this, you need to sort the dice, event card 1, weather cards (do not shuffle), goal cards 1-7, Adventure cards 1-10, goal tokens, and money tokens. Then onto the top left of the main board at the spring tile, place the starting resource tokens into the one slot on the bottom left. Then add in the forest cards into their matching number, leaving space 7 free for the Longhouse building, drawn from the building deck. Place the town action tiles onto the designated spaces on the board. Then finally roll one blue sprite die and one orange villager die and place them onto the horizontal space below the Longhouse. If you roll a blank, roll again until you get a different result. Each player now needs to choose a character. You can change characters each season, which takes around 30-45 minutes, so don't worry too much now. You won't be locked in. There is no real benefit to choosing one over the other, although I would say the Farmer is the easiest to learn for your first game. Take your character's miniature, tray, and all designated components. I won't go into full details for that here; it's best just to follow the instructions in each character's mini-manual. How to Play Mythwind Games of Mythwind take place over various seasons. Each season will cycle through the weather deck one time. There are ten starting weather cards. After these ten cards have been drawn, a new season will begin. Players can rotate characters in and out between each season, and you can easily change player count during this point too. All players will be working together on the development of the same town board, but characters can be worked on however, whenever, by whomever you like. Each day starts with the flip of the top weather card. You are now in the DAWN phase. During this period, you will check any weather effects as shown on the cards, which mainly allow you to draw the next Event card or allow you to advance any buildings that currently sit in the construction queue. Each new weather card is placed onto the top of the next one, showing the top part of the previous card so you can see the weather patterns over the days. Once you get to day three, you will now need to check that current season tile to see if you match any of the three different weather patterns there with the last three days of weather you have experienced. If so, carry out the action shown, generally giving you resources, sometimes taking them away. Some characters will now have their own unique action to carry out in the Dawn phase. For example, the Farmer will be able to Plant, Tend, Harvest, or Clear, depending on the day's weather matched to the current Season—essentially, a bonus action in their fields. The Ranger will decide if they plan to spend the current day in Town or go on an Adventure. If they are already out on an adventure, this part is obviously skipped. The Crafter has no effect, but the Merchant carries out a few steps. Depending on the season and current weather, a specific good will either increase or decrease its market value by 1. Unless it's cloudy, where there is no shift. The Merchant's customer or their rival will then perform an action depending on the weather card's effect. This effect will be for a customer to buy, sell, or manufacture goods. Players then enter the DAY phase. Here, all characters will move their miniature onto a space on the main board and carry out one Town action, unless they are playing as the Ranger and are currently out on an adventure. Players take turns to do this and can discuss between them the best course of action. In solo, simply do your own single town action. Town actions allow you to gain coins, clear land for a cost, buy resources for a cost, construct or demolish buildings for a cost, hire workers for a cost, go on a short single-day adventure, or use any other previously constructed buildings. Place your worker, carry out the action, and then all players move to the simultaneous character actions. When going on an adventure this way, simply draw the top card from the adventure deck, read it out loud, then choose an option of how to proceed. On the reverse of the card will be your reward/result based on your choice. Each action you take in Town will relate to either the Sprite or Workers alignment. Whichever action you do here will affect your choices in the character action phase. Each character has their character action phase, and I won't go into it in full here. But here is a brief summary. The Farmer will grow, tend, and harvest crops for money. Crops change in their cost each day, and there will always be one crop available for free. You can also acquire Cows and machinery for additional efficiencies and profits. The Ranger will go out on missions. You can choose the difficulty and decide which items to take with you to help. Each day you will flip a card showing you a choice from various encounters on that day. Each encounter will require a different tool to help you achieve it. If you have that required tool, you will be rewarded with various bonuses. When in town, you can gain new items and workers to help with later quests, upgrade your Rangers' skills, and prepare for bigger, longer, but more rewarding adventures. The Crafter will Gather and Refine materials, to then fulfil requests for new items from the other townsfolk. Selling them for large profits and enhancing their own reputation as a maker of fine goods, the Crafter can quickly help your Town develop through their successful trade. The Merchant is the most complex character. Their role is to buy and sell goods for profit. Rival merchants will come up against you as customers look at their various options to make their purchases. Once all players have concluded their character actions, players can then use any workers they have hired which allow them to carry out bonus actions. Workers become slowly exhausted each time they carry out an action, and when they do, they are re-rolled and placed back onto the main board to be purchased for hire again. Players then move to the DUSK phase where all workers used that turn are placed back into their characters' tray, players bring their miniature back from the town, unless it's the Ranger out in the wild, and then carry out their own unique character action. The Farmer replenishes any purchased crop in the market and The Crafter will fulfil any requests they have completed. The Ranger and Merchant have no extra actions. If there are more weather cards left in the Town tray, flip the next one over and carry out the following day. If there are none left, your season is over. Players carry out the end of season effects and then move to the next season. End of season effects are simple. You will resolve any end of season actions on any buildings you may have built, check to see if you met your current season goal, and if so, gain the shown reward. Then set the next goal for the following season. Change the season tile to the next one, gather all the weather cards and shuffle them up ready for the next season, and finally, decide if you want to carry on with the same character or change to a new one. Packing up characters is straightforward thanks to the trays they come with. I have been changing every three seasons or so with ease. Setting up the game mid-season is also a breeze. Simply gather the three town boards, pile them into one, and then gather on top of the town board with the tray lids on top. Place them back in the box and you are all set. It takes a minute, tops. Setting back up for your next play is also straightforward. Players can carry on this way until they want to stop, feel they have done all they can with the current character, or simply want a break. The game will develop in each character's progression as they gain new skills, become more efficient in their actions, and discover new things. The Town will develop new buildings, and mysteries will be revealed. Inside the box are a few secret envelopes that you will open when certain events tell you to do so. This introduces all sorts of new things I won't spoil here. There are 80 adventure cards, and I would imagine you would see 1-6 each season, depending on player count. There are 154 event cards, and you will generally see four each season. There are 28 goals, one used each season, and 42 building cards. And of course the four secret envelopes to open. There is a lot of game to explore here. But is this fun? Mythwind Board Game Review: Is It Fun? I want to love this. And I think I do. The game feels unique compared to most other games I have played; it is hard to compare it to other experiences. It shares elements of other games with the choose-your-own-adventure missions, character development, and town building. But to me, it feels more like a video game such as Animal Crossing than any board game I have played. The vibe is very chill. There is no real sense of urgency in the game, and the choices in the Events and Adventures, although they of course, affect your town stats and character development, won't ever feel imperative to the game's success. This is because there is no real judge of that. No real endpoint. No real win/lose condition. Each season you will develop your town a little and move your character on in terms of their skills and current income. But other than that, it won't ever feel like you are making huge strides. You will develop the story with the Event cards and Adventures but at a very relaxed pace and never with game-changing consequences it seems. It will depend on your own tastes if this is enough for you. I think most people would enjoy this game for a season or two for each character, learning how they all work and implementing a strategy to get the most efficiencies from each one is highly rewarding. I would say that takes a good three to five seasons per character to do. The game's longevity beyond this period though will be dependent on your feelings around the overall vibe. Personally, I think I love it. I wanted to love it, and I think it all looks gorgeous. So this must be having an effect on my opinion. I also adore the people behind this. Following them on social media and meeting Brendan at Spiel in 2023, I have to say I am a fan-boy of the entire team and project. Trying to put this bias aside, how do I feel when I play this? Well, other than the obvious words that come up a lot with this game... Relaxed. Chill. Calm. I also feel satisfied and intrigued. I am enjoying the progression and pace of the overall narrative of the game. There are enough twists and turns for the story to interest me, and I am keen to see where it goes next. I find each character to be interesting enough so that I am equally happy to play with them all. But I like the variety they bring. Changing them in and out is very simple, as I said, and I like the mixed feeling this brings to the game as I change my characters. Generally, for each play, I will bring a new character in. And I play for one to three seasons each play, time permitting. The Farmer initially felt a little simplistic to me, but as I started to bring in the Equipment, I started to really enjoy this little tile-laying puzzle. The Crafter was at first a chore. But I then started to really enjoy the process of Gathering, Refining, then selling items. It has a lovely simple linear progression to it, with a lot of little achievements. The Merchant took me the longest to get my head round, but I was still easily up and running within one season. The Ranger is my favourite to use. I like the sense of adventure and the planning nature of this character strangely reminds me of Raiders of the North Sea (Take that with a pinch of salt). I will 'finish' this game. My completist personality has risen to the forefront, and I am eager to see every card and develop every character to their fullest. I will back the next Kickstarter to get the next expansion, and I am keen to upgrade my components with the metal coins and extra characters. I love the ambition of this game and think it executes it brilliantly. There is a 'but' though. I am giving this game an 8/10, and I presume reading up to now you would think this sounds like a 9 or 10? So, why an 8? Well, it feels like a 1.0 version of this type of game. There is a lot of ambition in this project. But not as much as I feel there could be. If you have played The 7th Continent, it feels like the progression from that game to The 7th Citadel. Both are great games, but the second game developed the ideas and mechanics into a much richer game with bigger budgets and broader ambitions. Mythwind feels a little like this to me. They had an idea for a game and how it could work but were restricted, as any business would be, by time and budget to make it profitable, enjoyable, accessible, and out before the Kickstarter Trolls attacked. Now they have done this and seen some success, I do wonder how this game could develop. It is billed as a persistent-world over open-world, but my mind races at the thought of this being opened up to a bigger stage, and maybe more open-world. Now we have the basis of the game and the mechanics are down, could the developers bring in hundreds, no thousands of new Event and Adventure cards along with a few more characters and buildings to really take this game to the next level? Playing the game is fun. But I never feel like I am making decisions that massively impact anything. It doesn't scratch that usual board game itch of strategy and decision making. There is a lot of other things here instead. I just feel this is the beginning of a new style of game. Rather than the finished product. I certainly hope that is the case anyway. I much prefer this experience in solo play. At two players, it works fine, and you do feel like you are making more progress in your town and with your character development. However, each character has very different tasks during their own character actions, so this part feels much like multiplayer solo, and I felt a little like I was missing out as a character I was not controlling was developing without me. Each character takes a very different amount of time to carry out their actions, and waiting between phases of the Day and Dusk phase in multiplayer is frustrating when you just want to get on with the next day. I enjoy every minute with Mythwind, but I think I want more. Other reviewers have said it feels a bit "rinse and repeat," which is true to an extent. But overlaid with the mainly repetitive nature of each character's core mechanics is the overarching story, sense of adventure, and town-building aspect of the game that really interests me. I want more of this. After multiple games with each character, I am nowhere near finished with this game and eager to play more. I think expectations for a project of this ambition and scale are often higher than more regular releases. We should not judge this game on what it doesn't do but on what it brings and could do in the future, and for that, I am all in.

Cantaloop: A Hack of a Plan & Cantaloop: Against all Odds WBG Score: 7 & 9 Player Count: 1- 4 You’ll like this if you like: Cantaloop Book 1, any of the old point and click adventure games, Unlock Games Published by: Lookout Games Designed by: Friedemann Findeisen, Grzegorz Kobiela By Steve Godfrey This is the reviewer's copy. See our review policy here Way back in the early months of 2022 I reviewed the excellent point and click adventure throwback game book, Cantaloop: Breaking into Prison. Since then two follow up books “A Hack of a Plan” and “Against all Odds” (not the Phil Collins song) have been released to finish out the trilogy. I did toy with reviewing both books on their own but since they shared much of the same mechanics as the first game I figured a double bill was in order. If you want to see how this system works and my thoughts on the first book then feel free to check out my review here As is the way of things there will be No spoilers! Cantaloop Book 2: A hack of a plan Right from the off the book drops you right back into familiar territory with a full “previously on” style conversation between the three leads to help catch you up on the story. The dialogue captures the same tone as before and, if you’re playing these back to back it’s going to be a seamless transition. If however this is your first foray into this series and this style of game then A) what sort of person starts at part two? Seriously, it’s the equivalent of someone starting their saga with part four! B) don’t worry because this will give you a full run through of the rules. The puzzle structure plays out the same as the previous game and being that that was one of the stand out things from the first games I’m so glad that that didn’t change…... .well, for the most part. As the name suggests, hacking makes up a fair chunk of this instalment and because of this they’ve introduced a new type of puzzle to try and capture it. Unfortunately it’s the weakest part of the game, and it makes up a fair chunk of it, I’d say about 30%. Obviously I don’t want to spoil anything so all I will say is it’s a logic puzzle with a bit of programming involved. Each one turns up intermittently throughout the game. The first one starts off pretty simple and adds more elements and twists with each one. My issue is that as they get harder, they take longer to solve and, if these aren’t the sort of puzzles you enjoy or are good at then they’ll only become more frustrating and you’ll start to dread their appearance. Mostly because they’re taking you away from the fun puzzles and dialogue that’s so great about these games. However if these are your sort of puzzles then feel free to ignore everything I’ve just said because you may well have just as much fun with these as the other puzzles and you could easily rate this game up there with the rest of them. For me though, they weren’t something I enjoyed, I found them an increasingly unwelcome distraction that took me out of the story. I’ll admit that I found myself searching for the answers after the first couple of puzzles and then outright skipping them towards the last few. I know it doesn’t sound like I’m being a good gamer but honestly, doing that meant that I enjoyed the game more. I love the idea of them but they just weren’t for me. The rest of the book houses the same mechanisms, the same trigger system and the same hint system as the first. This is definitely the “Temple of Doom'' of the trilogy. There’s a lot of fun to be had out of it and you won’t want to skip it (mainly because you’ll be missing out on a whole third of the story) but don’t let that 30% that you might find unappealing put you off of playing this or carrying on to the third one. Speaking of which…….. Cantaloop Book 3: Against All Odds Just like book two you’ll get a full rundown of the rules, however, rather than a “previously on” style intro, this will literally throw you into the story as if you’ve just closed book two and immediately opened this one. It just assumes that you’ve done the previous two which, let’s be honest, is the sensible thing to do. If you’re starting on part three and you’re confused, then I can only assume that you’ll be going back and playing part one and two as some kind of prequels? If the hacking puzzles from book two put you off then don’t worry because those are absent here. This one goes back to its roots and sticks largely with the formula from the first book. That’s not to say that this is a copy and paste of course. They’ve still tried to throw a few new things our way to spice things up and I have to say, they’re pretty fun. One such puzzle type reminds me a bit of the old choose your own adventure games. Pick an option, follow a path and if you’re wrong then start again. Although this is designed that way so don’t feel like you're cheating when you back track. It may sound frustrating (and I can see how it could be) but these are meant to be more informed choices. The clues will be laid through the book as you get to them, it's just your job to pick them out. It adds a more investigatory element to the game, but not one that’ll overwhelm you if it’s not your thing. For that reason I’d definitely recommend having a pen and paper to hand to make (and I’ll quote my old school teachers in this) copious notes. Needless to say I didn’t do that back then and I didn’t do it here. That meant that solving these particular puzzles felt like I had to assume a lot of things when in fact the answers were right there, I just hadn’t taken that information in. This book certainly feels like it’s asking you to focus on a lot more details than previous books. It’s more akin to a mystery in that respect. I will say that there are some puzzles that, upon reading the solution, had me thinking “well I would have never thought of that” maybe I was having an unimaginative moment, I don’t know. One particular puzzle was a little bit convoluted, it had a lot of working parts and required you to keep track of a few things without visual clues, i.e. you did something to an object but didn’t get a card to remind you you’ve done it. It’s understandable, you can’t have a card for everything, but it definitely drives home the need to write some things down. It does highlight one of the drawbacks of this system compared to its video game counterpart. In a video game you could have easily labelled that thing. It’s not quite as easy here without adding cost to the game. I think this the Raiders of the Lost Ark of the trilogy, which is confusing because it’s book three but Last Crusade is my favourite of the movies and the first book is my favourite of the books sooo…… Visit costal Cantaloop Island. If you loved the first book then these are a must buy. The hacking in the second book notwithstanding (try the first few out and just skip them if you’re not enjoying them) you'll have a fun time with these books. They still give you all the nostalgia and the good stuff as the first and the story is really fun and I found myself genuinely invested in what happened to everyone. They ramped up really nicely and gave the books some great tension. Three books of such lethal cunning I’ve had a ton of fun with all three of these books and they’ve quickly become my favourite system for puzzle games. I can’t wait to see if/ how the designers and Lookout Games are going to progress this genre of game and how they can twist the system to fit different world’s, characters and genres. I’d love to see more from these characters but I’d also love to see some different worlds and characters….I just want more, I’m not greedy.

Ark Nova: Marine Worlds Expansion WBG Score: 10 Player Count: 1-4 You’ll like this if you like: Ark Nova Published by: Feuerland Spiele, Capstone Games Designed by: Mathias Wigge By Steve Godfrey This is the reviewer's copy. See our review policy here You know those times when you’ve eaten a big meal? The last thing you want to do is cram anymore, right? That is until you spy the dessert menu and it looks so good that you just can’t say no. Well the original deck of Ark Nova cards is your full stomach and the new marine worlds expansion is the dessert menu asking you to cram in just one more wafer thin mint. Is it worth eating the marine world's mint? Will that deck of cards explode if you do? I’ll let you know. As an aside I’ve REALLY got to stop talking about food in these reviews because it always makes me hungry. Just like most of the expansions I review I’ll break down everything in sections and talk about each aspect separately (where possible) so feel free to skip to a section if you’re wanting to know about something in particular. New Tokens Let’s start with the least impactful gameplay wise. Marine Worlds comes with some upgraded score markers for each colour now in the shape of a ticket for the appeal track, a mortar board for the reputation track and a shield icon for the conservation track. You’ll also get four sets of animal tokens for your player board to replace the cubes. A penguin, a fish, a wolf (I think) and a monkey. Are these necessary? No, do they have any impact on the game? Of course not. Was I stupidly excited to get my hands on these things? Yes….yes I was. Obviously it’s your choice if you choose to use them and maybe you’ve already gotten yourself some nice upgraded bits already. For me though they just made the game feel that bit more special. Now if we can just upgrade the money? New association board and universities So there is a new association board included that now includes space to house a new, fourth university type…....which they obviously give you. This board is hands down gonna be a permanent addition to the game for me (get used to that phrase because I feel like I’m gonna be saying it a lot with this expansion.) When you take the new university it lets you choose one of the six new universities that have  a research icon and one of the six animal types on it. These are great because not only are you getting an extra animal tag in your zoo, which helps massively if that particular type is not showing its face (much like a real zoo), but it also lets you reveal cards from the deck until you find one of that animal type. This is great! Being able to have two animal tags to go towards a conservation card (presuming you can play the card at some point) in one turn can be the difference between you scoring low for that card or giving you that push you to score higher. Get in quick though because although the new university refreshes each round with the others there is only one of each animal type so once someone’s nabbed it, it’s gone. You can still only have three universities and only one of the new ones, but I love that it adds a bit more choice when taking one. I used to find that taking that third university to score the conservation points (depending on the board you’re playing) felt like an arbitrary decision. If, for example, research icons weren’t part of your game plan then it could almost feel like wasting a turn to do it. But with this new one that little bit of extra choice makes all the difference. Action cards The new action cards are one of the two big things that I think most people are excited for in this box. First off there are new replacement Action cards for the base game. These are the same cards and work the same but they’ve changed some of the text to icons to make room for additional text with the new cards. You also get new action cards with a twist. After choosing your zoos, give each player three random action cards then draft one then pass them to your left, then again until you’ve got three cards again and then pick two of the three to keep. They must be two different action types, so you can’t choose two build cards for example, then set them up as per usual. Each of these will have their own special ability on them. For example, one animal card gives you a 2 money discount on the first animal you play on a turn. One upgraded build card lets you cover rock or water spaces and gives you 2 money for doing so. I love that Ark Nova is slowly drip feeding us this starting asymmetry. It obviously started with the alternate maps in the main box and then the additional map pack/s and now these new cards. Personally you could tell me I’m only allowed to play with the starting map from now on and I’d still happily play this game over and over without it feeling stale. But these new additions give it so much variety that I’d have to play this game every day for a long time before It starts to feel samey. The new cards are great and add so much to the game but without ever feeling too overwhelming. They’re also a nice way to change how you play. If you’re someone who’s played a lot of Ark Nova maybe you’ve got a way of doing things, maybe you upgrade cards in a specific order. Well now this may just make you change things up a bit since each new combo of cards can take your game in different directions. If you took the combo above for example you’ll most likely shift your focus more towards filling your zoo map. Ark Nova has always been a game of shifting strategies for me, mainly because of the randomness of the cards. That’s still not going to change with these cards but having cards that may shift your focus is a welcome boost to up the replayability. Marine Cards “Fish are friends, not food” and in the case of the new marine cards that’s particularly true. Let's address the elephant seal in the room. Ark Novas card deck is too big. It makes the game very random and you'll be lucky if you get near three quarters through it in a four player game. If anyone has problems with the game then you can almost guarantee that this is one of them. So adding another stack of cards is only going to inflate the problem like a particularly puffy puffer fish. Luckily they’ve thought of that. On all the new marine cards they’ve added a wave symbol. When you draw this and place it on the display you discard the first card in the display, slide everything up (just as you would normally) and draw a card for the end of the display. If you draw another wave symbol then do the same again. If you're still doing this after about three or four cards then you should probably start questioning the person who shuffled the deck. I love that one symbol addresses two problems in the game. One was that in some games and player counts the display would barely get refreshed and this provides a good way of cycling it round. It also means that you can't guarantee a card is going to be there for you next turn and it ups that tension when it comes to choosing if you should take a card or not. The other issue is making an already unwieldy deck of cards even more so. With this symbol you’ll be (potentially) cycling through the deck a bit more. Don’t get me wrong, you won’t suddenly find yourself reshuffling the deck every game. You’ll probably see about the same amount of cards as you normally would but it’s nice to know that they care enough to put things in place to try and help. You now have two new aquarium enclosures (two different sizes) which you can build  from the start of the game and most of the sea life will need to be housed exclusively in that type of enclosure. You can only build one of each size and they act like the reptile house in that you place cubes in them depending on the size of the animal. Reef dwellers are the coolest part of the new animals and if you love a combos like me then this’ll be right down your E.A.C dude (east Australian current for those who haven’t watched Finding Nemo) These animals have a coral reef symbol on the right of their card and a bonus on them. It could be money, a trade, a conservation point etc. Everytime you play one of these cards you trigger the coral reef ability of  ALL the reef dweller cards you’ve got in your zoo. It’s so satisfying as you start building these up and trigger more of them each time you play one. Given the fact that you're limited by the number of aquariums you can have and the amount of space you have you obviously won’t have a never ending stream of them. It’s also not wise to base a strategy on them either given the randomness of the deck, but if you do manage to get a few in play they are a lot of fun. Other stuff You’ll get a few replacement cards included. Some are different purely to change the iconography to include the new sea animals. The icons have been changed in such a way that you can leave these new cards in the deck even if you decide not to play with the expansion animals. Other cards like some of the bonus, conservation and sponsor cards have been changed to be a bit more balanced and in some cases easier to obtain higher scores. Should you explore under the sea? Do you need this expansion? Despite my 10/10 rating for it, no you don’t. There are very few expansions (in my experience anyway) that you “need.” If you’re still enjoying exploring Ark Nova in its base form and feel that that’s enough then there’s no real reason to add to the expansion just yet. However, if you love Ark Nova and are excited by the new stuff then you should absolutely get it (as long as you can afford to that is.) In fact if you love Ark Nova that much then you’ve probably already got this. This is one of those expansions that I never want to play the game without. It’s weird because it doesn’t do anything that will change your mind about the game if you didn’t like it. But if you’re already a fan then everything here is just gonna take that enjoyment up by a giraffe's neck. I’d potentially leave out the new action cards and possibly the sea animals if teaching to new players. More for the fact that I get bored of the sound of my own voice when teaching this game and you can see people’s eyes glaze over as you throw more and more things at them and I think the extra additions may be a touch too much on a game that can already be a bit or a teach as it is. Marine worlds is a fantastic addition to one of my favourite games. It’s a more stuff expansion that makes just enough changes to keep the game fresh for those who need it, but not change things drastically enough that it impacts on the things that people love about the base game.

After Us WBG Score: 6 Player Count: 1-6 You’ll like this if you like: It’s a Wonderful World, Lost Cities, Ecosystem Published by: Catch Up Games Designed by: Florian Sirieix By Steve Godfrey This is the reviewer's copy. See our review policy here A game about humans dying out and apes taking over the planet? Andy Serkis has got to be playing one of the apes in this game right?! I’ll tell you what. Read the review, check out the pictures and if you can spot him let me know. How to control the planet of the apes. Give everyone their player board, tokens and starting deck of cards in their colour. Shuffle the bonus tiles and pick three at random and place them face up. The majority of the game is going to be played simultaneously so if I reference a “turn” then assume that everyone is going to be playing at the same time. On a turn players will draw four cards from their deck and then place them in a line in front of them. You can then rearrange the cards into any order as long as they form a line. The only rule is that you can’t offset the cards. Each card is going to consist of a combination of three rows of icons in either full frames or half frames and as you rearrange the cards you’ll start to complete some of those frames. When you’re satisfied with the order of your cards you’ll then start to trigger your cards. You’ll go from top row to bottom row from left to right and you’ll only be able to use the effects of complete frames. The top row will generally consist of resources to gather and the bottom two rows will give you ways to convert them to either batteries, rage or victory points etc When everyone’s done you’ll each choose one of your four ape tokens and place them face down. You’ll reveal them and immediately take the bonus on the token. Either, taking two batteries, two VPs, two rage or reactivating one of your frames. You can then choose to take a new card of the ape type matching the token you chose, paying the specific resource type. A level one card will cost three resources and a level two will cost six. The card you take will go on the top of your deck so you'll definitely be using it next turn. At this point you can choose to copy the ability of one of your neighbours tokens by paying two resources. You won’t get to take another card though. As long as no one has got to 80 points by the end of the round then discard your cards and go for another round. A couple of other things. There will be three bonus cards out each game and you can spend an amount of batteries to trigger these. The card will tell you in which phase they can be played and they each do different things. Like, for example, letting you draw five cards instead of four, letting you put cards back on the top of your deck or even gaining straight up victory points. Lastly is rage. You can spend four rage to discard a card out of the game completely and help you thin your deck. When you do this the card will give you a resource or points as depicted in the rage box on the top of the card. If at the end of the round someone has got to 80 or more points they win. If more than one person has then the one with the most points wins. Apes. Together. Strong. I first heard of this game as stories emerged that people were running to get copies of this game at the 2023 UKGE and that the Hachette booth was selling out of copies in 20 minutes. It was like the After Us alpha male had beat its chest and the rest of its gamer tribe had come running to join its cardboard leader. That much hype tends to put me off trying a game rather than get me excited. Usually because these things rarely live up to the amount that’s been built up. So, naturally I put off trying the game for a good while, at least until everything had died down. Well that and the fact that nobody I knew near me had the game so that tends to put a hold on getting a game played. So here we are then, February 2024 and the hype train is slowing down. So, is it any good? Yes! To a point. The central puzzle of how you go about building your deck to try and maximise your resources and get more points is a lot of fun. Trying to order your cards to make the best possible combination for you and your game is certainly going to be your biggest source of brain burn and also frustration (but not in a bad way.) I guarantee that every time you set your cards up you’ll look down the rows and see some satisfying frames completed and you know you can get a load of resources and/or some really efficient conversions. However, you’ll also look down and see all those frames you can’t complete…..or you can complete them, but not without sacrificing something else in its stead. It’s that puzzle that will see players constantly reordering cards and muttering “yes!…….oh wait, no, maybe if I do this?” It immediately makes you answer the question, “what are your priorities?” It makes you choose what path you want to follow this time and the game lets you do that by giving you the tools you need. You’ve just got to figure out how to best make them work with the cards you’ve got each round. How you’re going to utilise those resources that you’ve just cleverly arranged is your next choice. The cards will often tease you with ways to spend those hard earned resources on some shiny points (literally, the VP symbol is a light bulb), much in the same way you’d use Fay Wray to tease King Kong (more on the big boy later.) After all, this game is a race, it’s all about the points so why wouldn’t you get the things that you need to win the game? But just as a famous chaos mathematician once said “just because you could, you didn’t stop to think if you should.” Points are good, but saving resources for more cards could be even better. That is to say that After Us is also part deck builder and if you’ve ever played a deck builder before then you’ll know that you can’t rest on the laurels of your starter deck if you want to do well. Especially if your opponents are improving their decks with better cards and thinning their deck with the game's rage system, which provides a really effective way to thin your deck. Take this from someone who constantly struggles to do this in deck builders. You’ll start off feeling proud of the amount of points you're getting but if you don’t improve your deck you’ll be left behind slipping on banana skins….or just really far behind on points Each type of ape you add to your deck will bring something different to the party. We at WhatBoardGame don’t recommend partying with apes, they end up hanging around for way too long... Anyway, for those still with me, Gorillas are rage focused which will help you shed cards from your deck. Mandrills are all about victory points, Orangutans have the power and will give you batteries and Chimps are the mimics and will let you reactive frames. Which route you take to victory is entirely up to you, whether or not you go for more of one type or try to get an even balance will depend entirely on your preferred play style and how your opponents are choosing to play and how / if you decide to try and counteract that. After us is, after all, a race and you want to make sure that your opponents aren’t too far ahead. The game’s called After Us, not After You! The game does a decent job of ramping up in the same vein as most deck builders. As your deck builds the points and the resources start to flow with ease and what initially felt like your points marker barely moving soon turns into giant leaps down the track. Building a good deck can be the difference between trailing behind to get hit with the banana skin to managing to catch up and hit your opponents with the green shell….no, sorry, that’s Mario Kart Get your hands off me! After Us is a largely solo affair with almost no interaction between players. I could also see arguments to be made that there’s no interaction at all. Apart from the points track. For a lot of people this will be a major drawback and in this instance it’s a big drawback for me as well. It’s similar in that respect to something like Welcome To…… or most roll and writes for that matter and it’s odd because in those games the multiplayer solitaire aspect doesn’t bother me, but in this I really feel it. I think the reason it bothers me in After Us is that this game, to me, feels like it’s crying out to have some more interaction. It's essentially a race game and to have that race component to it and not have some sort of back and forth  and interaction between players feels off somehow. Even the deck building, where normally you’d get to show off to your friends this awesome deck you’ve built by playing all your flashy combos, here you keep all that to yourself other than when someone says “how did you get all those points?” and you have to walk them through it. Not because they don’t trust you, but you just want an excuse to look clever…..at least that’s why I do it anyway. Strangely, the chaos of everyone grabbing resources, moving markers up tracks and generally getting in each other's way makes the solitary nature of the game more pronounced for me. It makes me more aware of others around the table and the fact that you are actually playing a game with other people, but you're just not talking to them and I feel like I should be. Whereas, say in a roll and write you just get lost in your own thing and acknowledge people after the game when you're comparing scores. Speaking of scores, having those bigger point swings towards the end of the game means that it’s not easy to predict when the games are gonna end. You could easily argue that that adds some tension towards the end. But I’ve found that games often just end really abruptly. You’ll think you’ve got at least a couple of rounds before the end and then whilst you’re playing your cards you’ll look up and realise that someone’s just shot past 80 and that it, end of the game and chances are you may not be able to get near them with the cards you got and that’s it. You play out the rest of the round and it just falls flat without any of the tension. The King of Apes So considering the solo nature of the game I should probably talk about the solo mode. On the King's turn (which is the name of the solo AI) give him three of each resource and two batteries and then draw four cards and take certain points or resources depending on what you draw. You then take your turn which plays out the same except you take the resources from the King's supply first. The king will then take a card depending on the largest resource type he has. He will also discard cards using any rage he gets and and will spend batteries to trigger the computer bonus card if he can afford it (for this card you spend 5 batteries to score 5 points). The solo game is pretty easy to run but man is it difficult to beat. Points for theme here because it feels like going up against King Kong, except King Kong would probably finish me off quicker than this solo mode which lulls me into a false sense of security that I’m doing well, before it absolutely decimates me. Better players than me (which is most people I’d imagine) will more than likely beat this but I think that it’s varied enough that it can present a decent challenge every time. What I like about the solo mode is that it gives you that extra crunch as you're not only trying to gather resources for your own benefit, but also to make sure that the King can’t afford a card this turn or won’t have the batteries to get those five points. I honestly don’t know how much more replay I’ll get from After Us. The last game I played I got about half way through and I started to become aware of how I was just mechanically going through the same motions that I had done on all the previous rounds and on all the previous games and I was starting to lose interest. Which is a shame because there are some good elements to it and I know a lot of people really love it, but for me it doesn’t hit nearly as well. I’ll say as well that if any of this game sounds appealing to you then it could be well worth checking out. I’ll happily sit down and play if a group wants to play it but for me though I’d rather play it turn based on Board Game Arena, where it seems to suit this game better or maybe pull it out as a solo game, if it's still in the collection. Before you go! Did you spot Andy Serkis? Oh really, you didn’t? Weird, I swear I saw him, go though and have another look, or maybe go and check out some other reviews on the site In case he’s snuck in there.